🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision over how to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.